Fertility Issue In Men After Pfizer Vax?! IMPAIRED Semen Concentration & Total Motile Count, Study Finds
This article has been made into a movie and a follow up with more info
Doctors today are discussing a new study from the Journal Andrology by Wiley
The data comes from 37 sperm bank donors with differential analysis done on sperm quality for three time periods: T1, T2 and T3 – short (5-45 days), intermediate (75-150 days), and long term (150+ days) In the study results they tell us the following:
T1 collection was 26.7 +/- 10 days after T0
T2 collection was 92.5 +/- 13 days after T0
T3 collection was 174.8 +/- 26.8 days after T0
Sperm Concentration represents the estimated number of sperm cells per milliliter.
Total Motile Count represents the estimated total number of swimming sperm cells per ejaculate
“Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline.” (src)
“−15.4% sperm concentration decrease on T2 (CI -25.5%–3.9%, p = 0.01) leading to total motile count 22.1% reduction (CI -35% - -6.6%, p = 0.007) compared to T0.” (src)
Increased PSA Levels Seen After Vaccines (Flashback To June 2021)
This is very reminiscent to a video I published a year ago, June 2021. WARNING: PSA Levels Elevated For Some Men After Vaccine, PSA Associated With Infertility & Cancer
Does Fertility Return Or Not (Here Come The Fact Checkers)
The paper’s authors concluded that vaccinees’ “long-term prognosis remains good” and that “deterioration three months after vaccination” is “followed by later recovery”
But did the total motile count (a primary measurement of male fertility) really recover? Keep in mind that the period named T3 covers anything more than 150 days. The paper says that total motile sperm count is DOWN 19.4% for T3. T3 collection was 174.8 +/- 26.8 days. This is basically 6 months post vaccine with still substantially reduced TMC. Remember, none of the recipients appear to have received their boosters yet, just 2 Pfizer shots.
Let’s also evaluate WHY the total motile counts slightly recovered from -22.1% in T2 to -19.4% in T3. The semen volume per ejaculate was the largest contributing factor. From being 94.5% of the T0 volume at T2 to being 109% of T0 volume at T3, this means ejactulates were 15.34% larger in T3 than in T2. This is the reason that total motile count was able to recover +3.4% in T3 vs T2, despite further decreases in motility (-2.2) and concentration (-3.2%) in T3 vs T2.
So how could the papers’ 7 authors all conclude that everything recovers? Well, by ignoring the averages and looking at the medians.
A data series’ median is the middle item of the sorted values (or halfway between the middle-most values if the series is of even length) Medians and means deviate when the underlying distribution is skewed and/or due to the presence of outliers. This article explains this concept further with some related examples and concludes that we need to see the individual data points to better understand why the mean and average are so divergent.
Why is the average still so suppressed 6 months after the second dose (-19.4% TMC under T0 baseline), but the median shows +6,000,000 moving sperm per ejaculate over T0 baselines? How can the mean and the median tell such different stories?
Let’s look at an organized list of the the averages and the 25%, 50% and 75% quartiles for each of the metrics for both T0→T2 and T0→T3
25% quartile change T0→T2: -21,250,000 sperm per ml
Average change from T0→T2: -15.4%
Median change from T0→T2: -9,500,000 sperm per ml
75% quartile change T0→T2: -2,750,000 sperm per ml
25% quartile change T0→T3: -40,200,000 sperm per ml
Average change from T0→T3: -15.9%
Median change from T0→T3: -2,500,000 sperm per ml
75% quartile change T0→T3: +10,750,000 sperm per ml
25% quartile change T0→T2: -8.25%
Average change from T0→T2: -1.9%
Median change from T0→T2: -5%
75% quartile change T0→T2: +4.4%
25% quartile change T0→T3: -6%
Average change from T0→T3: -4.1%
Median change from T0→T3: +2.5%
75% quartile change T0→T3: +5%
Total Motile Count:
25% quartile change T0→T2: -46,100,000 sperm
Average change from T0→T2: -22.1%
Median change from T0→T2: -27,300,000 sperm
75% quartile change T0→T2: -1,900,000 sperm
25% quartile change T0→T3: -28,200,000 sperm
Average change from T0→T3: -19.4%
Median change from T0→T3: +6,000,000 sperm
75% quartile change T0→T3: +20,100,000 sperm
AP’s “Fact Check”
AP ran out a fact check attempting to dispel one interpretation that after a third shot the damage to fertility would be “almost unrecoverable.” AP admits that the study “did find that there was a temporary reduction in sperm count of about 22% among samples from donors three months after the second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.” But they assure us that the researchers behind the Israeli study say that the levels return somewhat to normal in 6 months:
The researchers found at six months that the reduction “disappeared,” Gat said. “We came to the conclusion that impairment is temporary and long term outcome remains good.”
Did AP not notice that nobody in the trial was boosted (as Fauci and other TV doctors repeatedly insist folks do)? Then they point to another huge admission from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine & The Society for Male Reproduction and Urology from January 9, 2021, just weeks after the vaccines were rolled out as “safe”:
It should be noted that about 16% of men in the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial experienced fever after the second dose. Fevers can cause temporary declines in sperm production. Thus, if a man experiences fever as the result of the COVID-19 vaccine, he may experience a temporary decline in sperm production
According to Pfizer’s EUA submission data, fever was a very common side effect, experienced by 3.7% after dose 1 and 15.8% in dose 2:
According to the FDA’s fact sheet for Pfizer
24.3% of adolescents aged 12 through 15 years had at least one fever following the first two shots
14.2% of individuals 16+ years of age had at least one fever following the first two shots
What percentage get fever after their boosters? The fact sheet doesn’t say. Fever is not even listed there:
The CDC says:
Reactions reported after getting a booster shot are similar to those after the two-dose or single-dose primary shots. Fever, headache, fatigue, and pain at the injection site were the most commonly reported side effects
According to the FDA meeting in September 2021 in the absurdly small safety study of 289 booster recipients 18-55 years old, adverse event rates after their booster dose were: 83% pain at the injection site, 8% swelling, 5.9% redness >2.0 cm, 63.8% fatigue, 48.4% headache, 39.1% muscle pain, 29.1% chills, 25.3% joint pain, 8.7% diarrhea, 8.7% fever, 5.2% lymphadenopathy, 1.3% gastrointestinal disorders
I wonder why they left that off the fact sheet? Yet another in a long list of Nuremberg violations!
Back to the AP fact check. It is interesting that the AP cites the average mean reduction of -22% when it says:
A recent Israeli study in the journal Andrology did find that there was a temporary reduction in sperm count of about 22% among samples from donors three months after the second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.
Like most people would, AP fact checkers consider the average change in sperm count (as opposed to the median change) to be the most noteworthy metric. By the exact same logic as the previous quote, one could say: “The study did find that there was a reduction in sperm count of about 19.4% six months (T3 collection was 174.8 +/- 26.8 days) after the second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.” Yet for some reason (profit? genocide?), AP suddenly switches to using the median to conclude fertility recovers by 6 months.
In reality, both the average and the median of a data set are important metrics that tell just part of the story. To really get to the heart of the matter we’d need to see the complete data, something that has not been made public yet. But the fact that average total motile count plummets 22.1% after 3 months & is still suppressed at negative 19.4% months after the second dose is extremely troubling.
A History Of Sterilization
Remember that groups affiliated with Rockefeller and Gates billionaires, namely the WHO & UNICEF, have credible allegations against them alleging they intentionally & repeatedly deployed anti-fertility serum in the place of tetanus vaccines. This has been reportedly confirmed by numerous independent laboratories.
Remember The Jaffe Memo to Rockefeller’s Population Council in 1969 which advocated for reducing the fertility rate? Among a litany of hideous ideas toward this end: including requiring government licenses to have children, adding infertility chemicals to water supplies and promoting homosexuality:
Bernard Berelson, head of the Population Council, turned around after receiving this memo and in 1969 published in the Population Council’s publication, “Studies in Family Planning” an article called “Beyond Family Planning.” This sordid document included similar ideas as those espoused by Jaffe:
These depopulation ideals were furthered in the Nixon presidency where Henry Kissinger & Rockefeller decided there were too many people and tasked the US gov’t with reducing the future population:
There is no single approach which will "solve" the population problem… Coordination among the bilateral donors and multilateral organizations is vital to any effort to moderate population growth… World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate… actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.
Tim Truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
There is so much more to this sinister plan to exterminate our progeny, which will be covered in future reports and documentaries… but let’s just say it looks like their evil plan is being executed, in one form or another: