3 Comments

Wow. Thanks.

Expand full comment

The cost to clean up those contaminated sites is enormous. I can't see how it is fair for the Govt to have to eat it all if properties are sold under value. The EPA's $ is really our money, so in that respect, the taxpayers would be the ones getting ripped off if corporate entities swoop in and buy up the land for pennies on the dollar after it (theoretically) were to get cleaned up. There are exceptions for individual landowners. That said, the EPA fine schedule is out of whack and needs major adjustment. Why shouldn't N&S RR have to pay the cleanup cost recoupment fines *if* the properties are cleaned up (debatable if even possible for such a huge area) instead of the prospective buyers?

Expand full comment

Thank you but now this...... Something should have already happened to try and stop this.....the WHO treaty is tomorrow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "There are amendments proposed to international law that are binding. Waiting for changes of the original document upon approval from the different nations. 307 amendments, plus extra annexes. In short, signatories from all these countries will discuss matters further, while they will not need approval from their legislations for signing the final document" 194 countries are about to sign over their national sovereignty to the W.H.O. on February 27th in a new P•nd•mic Treaty. This would give the W.H.O. LEGAL AUTHORITY to declare a P•nd•mic and manage the response of every nation including lock-downs, mandatory vac••nations, 24/7 surveillance of the population, supply chains and much more. This is the greatest threat to humanity right now. It would be the end of the world & freedom as we know it

Expand full comment