Amen Bill! Ask the pertinent questions, get people to think from a different perspective, and hopefully, arrive at their own, logical conclusions.
Who, or what can you trust these days, truly?
As our friend Tom Cowan says.... How do we know something is TRUE or REAL? We can only rely on our senses, experiences, and use logic & reasoning. Because everything else is essentially just "because someone told you it was true/real" and/or "consensus" - which is never a logical way to think.
IVM is the jab = the spike pesticide itself ... HCQ helps it get into brain and past barriers like gut, placenta, teat ... they are designed to deplete already deprived flush niacin + lactoferrin ... that's the pandemic
Scuse me, but those of us in the "no virus camp" have been screaming this from the rooftops for MONTHS!
Also, since there is no virus, what the hell are people taking Ivermectin & HCQ for exactly? They don't know. Even germ believers who don't believe that they "got COVID" willingly propagate ivermectin & HCQ, which i also find quite strange.
The uniqueness of each and every individual all genetically, epi-genetically and biochemically affords that any foreign product that a human or animal is exposed to poses always a risk of harm. It is naive for any competent or not so competent individual to treat products different from water as the same as such.
In the present study, high level of chromosomal damage and micronuclei formation were induced in
bone marrow cells indicating the genotoxic potential of IVM. These results reflect the latent harmful effects
which may be encountered during treatment with IVM.It is concluded from the present work that the mutagenic
effects fortunately diminished with time. According to the obtained results cautions use of IVM is advisible."
NO other paper I have looked for even with Elicit AI has EVER (to my knowledge that I could find) analyzed that the damage can reverse by itself even with no anti oxidant or anything else in DAYS.
On the other hand if you look for geno and cyto toxicity of over the counter and widespread prescription drugs be prepared for huge surprises, so as to make the point of geno toxicity a ploy of misinformation and to steer people away from specifically Ivermectin
GENOTOXIC EFFECT OF PARACETAMOL CONTAINING TABLETS IN CULTURED HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES
A. T. +1
2011 ·
8 citations
DOI
Paracetamol-containing tablets have genotoxic effects on cultured human lymphocytes.
Citotoxicidad y genotoxicidad en células humanas expuestas in vitro a glifosato
Claudia Milena Monroy +3
2005 ·
70 citations
DOI
The paper is not relevant to the query, as it examines the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the herbicide glyphosate in human cells, not a random over-the-counter medication.
[Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of human cells exposed in vitro to glyphosate].
Claudia M. Monroy +3
Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud
2005 ·
24 citations
Glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, exhibits cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in human cells, suggesting its mechanism of action is not limited to plant cells.
In Vitro Cyto-genotoxicity of Hydroxycitric Acid: A Weight-loss Dietary Supplement
Ilika Ghosh +1
2017 ·
4 citations
DOI
The paper examines the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of hydroxycitric acid, a weight-loss dietary supplement, in human cells.
Cytogenetic Evaluation of Paracetamol Effects in Human Lymphocytes Culture
S. Ibrulj +4
Drug and chemical toxicology (New York, N.Y. 1978)
2007 ·
7 citations
DOI
High doses of paracetamol (200 μg/mL) can have genotoxic effects on human lymphocytes.
Toxic, Genotoxic and Teratogenic Effects of Ibuprofen and its Derivatives.
Dilan Calisici +2
Current Drug Targets
2023 ·
6 citations
DOI
Ibuprofen can be toxic, genotoxic, and teratogenic, especially in overdose or misuse situations.
OTC pharmaceuticals and genotoxicity testing: the paracetamol, anthraquinone, and griseofulvin cases.
L. Müller +1
Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement
1995 ·
9 citations
DOI
Paracetamol, anthraquinones, and griseofulvin have genotoxic and cytotoxic potential that was only recently discovered for these long-used over-the-counter medications.
Aspirin Delimits Platelet Life Span by Proteasomal Inhibition
Manasa K. Nayak +3
PLoS ONE
2014 ·
26 citations
PDF
DOI
Aspirin can reduce platelet lifespan and induce platelet apoptosis, suggesting potential cytotoxicity.
Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and mechanism of action (via gene expression analysis) of the indole alkaloid aspidospermine (antiparasitic) extracted from Aspidosperma polyneuron in HepG2 cells
G. Coatti +5
Cytotechnology (Dordrecht)
2016 ·
12 citations
DOI
Aspidospermine, an indole alkaloid with antiparasitic properties, is cytotoxic and genotoxic to human HepG2 cells.
Analysis of Toxicity Effects of Buspirone, Cetirizine and Olanzapine on Human Blood Lymphocytes: in Vitro Model.
A. Salimi +2
Current Clinical Pharmacology
2018 ·
9 citations
DOI
Buspirone and cetirizine, but not olanzapine, show cytotoxicity to human lymphocytes through oxidative stress and organelle damage.
Bacterial genotoxicity of nitrosated famotidine.
S. De Flora +5
Mutagenesis
1986 ·
9 citations
DOI
Famotidine can become genotoxic when nitrosated, but is not inherently mutagenic.
Evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of fexofenadine in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
C. B. Kasurka +2
Toxicology in Vitro
2011 ·
10 citations
DOI
Fexofenadine has cytotoxic but not genotoxic effects on human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
Omeprazole treatment: genotoxicity biomarkers, and potential to induce CYP1A2 activity in humans
B. Sinúes +4
Human and Experimental Toxicology
2004 ·
5 citations
PDF
DOI
This paper examines the genotoxicity and CYP1A2 induction potential of omeprazole
Omeprazole: an exploration of its reported genotoxicity.
H. Rosenkranz +1
Mutagenesis
1991 ·
12 citations
DOI
Omeprazole may have genotoxic and carcinogenic potential due to its unstable sulphenimide metabolite.
Lack of evidence of omeprazole genotoxicity in Sprague-Dawley rats.
E. Mereto +3
Mutagenesis
1993 ·
13 citations
DOI
Omeprazole did not induce DNA fragmentation or clastogenic activity in rats, but showed potential promoting activity on liver tumors.
Pharmacological Effects and Toxicogenetic Impacts of Omeprazole: Genomic Instability and Cancer
M. F. C. J. Paz +21
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
2020 ·
18 citations
PDF
DOI
Long-term use of omeprazole can induce genomic instability and increase the risk of certain types of cancer.
Mechanisms of the Statins Cytotoxicity in Freshly Isolated Rat Hepatocytes
N. Abdoli +3
Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology
2013 ·
61 citations
PDF
DOI
Statins can cause cytotoxicity in rat hepatocytes through oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.
Gene Expression Analysis for Statin-induced Cytotoxicity from Rat Primary Hepatocytes
M. Ko +5
2010 ·
3 citations
DOI
The paper examines gene expression changes in rat primary hepatocytes to understand the mechanism of statin-induced liver toxicity.
Statins: Adverse reactions, oxidative stress and metabolic interactions
Aimei Liu +9
Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2019 ·
108 citations
DOI
Excessive or long-term use of statins can cause cytotoxicity, liver injury, kidney damage, and myopathy, which may be mediated by oxidative stress.
unfortunately i could go on citing papers like these for days....
yeah that bogus "dirt road" Danny he was a fake and he got thousands of people to trust this evil crap!! and then he dies suddenly? what a exit plan after he knowingly participated in getting innocent people to take it. Yes I took a few tubes but then Father God and Holy Spirit told me to throw it all out!! I am so glad I did and someone is still pushing that damn fenzabozle as well on rumormillnews.com to-day Thanks Tim for standing for Father God and Truth!!
SARS-COV2 (or any so-called "variant") and HIV do not exist. No virus has ever fulfilled Koch's or River's postulates. No experiment to isolate has followed the scientific method - there are no controls.
Their method of "isolation" seems to serve the exact opposite of the definition- rather than to separate from everything else, they ADD more unknown genetic material to the petri dish of supposedly "infected" viral cells... then they add toxic chemicals & nutrient-depleting chemicald.... then they say "Ah-ha! The cells are dying!!! Therefore, it MUST be a virus!"
No shit the cells are dying. Thats what happens when you poison cells & starve them of critical nutrients.
They never do the exact same steps but without adding supposedly "infected" viral sample. However, Dr Stephan Lanka has done it. And he has disproven the entire THEORY of virology.
You seem confused - you cant "mimic" something that does not exist. It isn't possible.
Cell cultures are not equivalent to a bioweapon. It is a toxic soup of biological and pharmaceutical components. Thats it. Youre conflating the so-called "isolation" process with a bio-weapon. Which is incorrect.
It 'has' been around for decades. Before the psychopaths pivoted to prompt-lethal injections. Was on the WHO list of essential medicines. Had been patented.
Pharma wasn't ever pure. Nor WHO. Or FDA/CDC.. So none of that probably matters.
But, with many Billions of doses administered over decades, into humans and livestock, surely these 'issues' would have presented? The sample size is massive.
I would want to dive deep on each trial, each PI, and anyone associated with them. We've already seen that virtually no-one absent conflicts of interest gets published. Or sits on the Boards. Or Panels. Or, Or, Or...
I guess the only 'cure' you can really trust is the one you grow yourself or take from nature. What a terrible state we've been driven to - trust has been decimated. And it is all aligned with the 4th IR Firesale - everything must crumble before the Luciferians BBB.
You need to accept that any product that is foreign to human biochemistry always has the potential to be harmful. Toxicology must be respected when dealing with anything injected, transdermally applied, consumed or inhaled into the sinuses or lungs.
Any belief is irrelevant as facts and understanding matter conclusively.
Thats some backwards logic ya got there. You're told 1 big pharma drug is "safe & effective", while knowing that is a flat out lie.
Then there are conflicting mainstream opinions on whether Ivermectin is "safe & effective" (despite the fence-sitters & those who buy into germ theory choosing to believe the messaging was 100% "negative" , there were actually tons of so-called "normies" and mainstream sources who were pushing Ivermectin & HCQ). But somehow THIS big pharma drug is OBVIOUSLY actually "safe & effective".
Rather than flat out tell yourself that you can't trust THIS study for some arbitrary reason (but other studies are ok, as long as they show positive outcomes right?), consider this source instead?
Holy shit!!!
Great job, Tim! This is a fantastic deep dive.
Thank you!!
I'm sure my mentor & friend "Nurse Rose" would be thanking you, if she were still around.
❤️🙏🙇☺️🌹
PS: want to go deeper?
1: Look into whether ivermectin is effective at curing onchocerciasis! (Which is its claim as a "wonder drug")
2: Which agency is involved in tracking ivermectin toxicity surveillance data? (It's really interesting, when you find out "WHO"!)
3: Look into what famous foundation is funding ivermectin research... Could it be.... Yes it could be!
Amen Bill! Ask the pertinent questions, get people to think from a different perspective, and hopefully, arrive at their own, logical conclusions.
Who, or what can you trust these days, truly?
As our friend Tom Cowan says.... How do we know something is TRUE or REAL? We can only rely on our senses, experiences, and use logic & reasoning. Because everything else is essentially just "because someone told you it was true/real" and/or "consensus" - which is never a logical way to think.
IVM is the jab = the spike pesticide itself ... HCQ helps it get into brain and past barriers like gut, placenta, teat ... they are designed to deplete already deprived flush niacin + lactoferrin ... that's the pandemic
genociding many people ...
flush niacin + lactoferrin is your savior.
enjoy
twitter.com/DrKrehl
> IVM is the jab = the spike pesticide itself .
Huh? You seem a little bit mixed up.
IVM is the jab = the spike pesticide itself
Scuse me, but those of us in the "no virus camp" have been screaming this from the rooftops for MONTHS!
Also, since there is no virus, what the hell are people taking Ivermectin & HCQ for exactly? They don't know. Even germ believers who don't believe that they "got COVID" willingly propagate ivermectin & HCQ, which i also find quite strange.
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/IVERMECTIN:0c5
Why are you double-replying to every comment the exact same thing? I have like 6 notifications from you that are identical.
Ivermectin is not the injection. Im not even going to entertain that statement any further.
The spike protein does not exist. Stop spamming comments
The uniqueness of each and every individual all genetically, epi-genetically and biochemically affords that any foreign product that a human or animal is exposed to poses always a risk of harm. It is naive for any competent or not so competent individual to treat products different from water as the same as such.
BS
If fertility and cancer were issues then
why are all the regularly ivm-dosed ivm countries in africa so fertile?
why is the thoroughbred horse and cattle industry thriving?
why didn't they bring this out in 2021?
why are they bringing it out just now when they don't want people to trust alternatives but want people to accept the monkey pox vaccine?
why has ivm been used safely for over 50 years and won a Nobel prize?
why is ivm so successful at treating stage four cancers?
Ask yourself the above before you swallow this propaganda.
billions of doses over the years wiyh near zero side-effects & single digit deaths.
Misinformation to steer people away from specifically Ivermectin that destroys spike and kilsl cancer cells...don't think so??? read on....
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.717529/full
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/116/18/3593/27970/The-antiparasitic-agent-ivermectin-induces
https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-019-1251-7
After so many papers I do not doubt that cyto or geno toxic damage may happen, but I also point out that aside from the paper "
https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jestft/papers/vol9-issue2/Version-3/D09231729.pdf
Conclusion
In the present study, high level of chromosomal damage and micronuclei formation were induced in
bone marrow cells indicating the genotoxic potential of IVM. These results reflect the latent harmful effects
which may be encountered during treatment with IVM.It is concluded from the present work that the mutagenic
effects fortunately diminished with time. According to the obtained results cautions use of IVM is advisible."
NO other paper I have looked for even with Elicit AI has EVER (to my knowledge that I could find) analyzed that the damage can reverse by itself even with no anti oxidant or anything else in DAYS.
On the other hand if you look for geno and cyto toxicity of over the counter and widespread prescription drugs be prepared for huge surprises, so as to make the point of geno toxicity a ploy of misinformation and to steer people away from specifically Ivermectin
GENOTOXIC EFFECT OF PARACETAMOL CONTAINING TABLETS IN CULTURED HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES
A. T. +1
2011 ·
8 citations
DOI
Paracetamol-containing tablets have genotoxic effects on cultured human lymphocytes.
Citotoxicidad y genotoxicidad en células humanas expuestas in vitro a glifosato
Claudia Milena Monroy +3
2005 ·
70 citations
DOI
The paper is not relevant to the query, as it examines the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the herbicide glyphosate in human cells, not a random over-the-counter medication.
[Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of human cells exposed in vitro to glyphosate].
Claudia M. Monroy +3
Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud
2005 ·
24 citations
Glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, exhibits cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in human cells, suggesting its mechanism of action is not limited to plant cells.
In Vitro Cyto-genotoxicity of Hydroxycitric Acid: A Weight-loss Dietary Supplement
Ilika Ghosh +1
2017 ·
4 citations
DOI
The paper examines the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of hydroxycitric acid, a weight-loss dietary supplement, in human cells.
Cytogenetic Evaluation of Paracetamol Effects in Human Lymphocytes Culture
S. Ibrulj +4
Drug and chemical toxicology (New York, N.Y. 1978)
2007 ·
7 citations
DOI
High doses of paracetamol (200 μg/mL) can have genotoxic effects on human lymphocytes.
Toxic, Genotoxic and Teratogenic Effects of Ibuprofen and its Derivatives.
Dilan Calisici +2
Current Drug Targets
2023 ·
6 citations
DOI
Ibuprofen can be toxic, genotoxic, and teratogenic, especially in overdose or misuse situations.
OTC pharmaceuticals and genotoxicity testing: the paracetamol, anthraquinone, and griseofulvin cases.
L. Müller +1
Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement
1995 ·
9 citations
DOI
Paracetamol, anthraquinones, and griseofulvin have genotoxic and cytotoxic potential that was only recently discovered for these long-used over-the-counter medications.
Aspirin Delimits Platelet Life Span by Proteasomal Inhibition
Manasa K. Nayak +3
PLoS ONE
2014 ·
26 citations
PDF
DOI
Aspirin can reduce platelet lifespan and induce platelet apoptosis, suggesting potential cytotoxicity.
Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and mechanism of action (via gene expression analysis) of the indole alkaloid aspidospermine (antiparasitic) extracted from Aspidosperma polyneuron in HepG2 cells
G. Coatti +5
Cytotechnology (Dordrecht)
2016 ·
12 citations
DOI
Aspidospermine, an indole alkaloid with antiparasitic properties, is cytotoxic and genotoxic to human HepG2 cells.
Analysis of Toxicity Effects of Buspirone, Cetirizine and Olanzapine on Human Blood Lymphocytes: in Vitro Model.
A. Salimi +2
Current Clinical Pharmacology
2018 ·
9 citations
DOI
Buspirone and cetirizine, but not olanzapine, show cytotoxicity to human lymphocytes through oxidative stress and organelle damage.
Bacterial genotoxicity of nitrosated famotidine.
S. De Flora +5
Mutagenesis
1986 ·
9 citations
DOI
Famotidine can become genotoxic when nitrosated, but is not inherently mutagenic.
Evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of fexofenadine in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
C. B. Kasurka +2
Toxicology in Vitro
2011 ·
10 citations
DOI
Fexofenadine has cytotoxic but not genotoxic effects on human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
Omeprazole treatment: genotoxicity biomarkers, and potential to induce CYP1A2 activity in humans
B. Sinúes +4
Human and Experimental Toxicology
2004 ·
5 citations
PDF
DOI
This paper examines the genotoxicity and CYP1A2 induction potential of omeprazole
Omeprazole: an exploration of its reported genotoxicity.
H. Rosenkranz +1
Mutagenesis
1991 ·
12 citations
DOI
Omeprazole may have genotoxic and carcinogenic potential due to its unstable sulphenimide metabolite.
Lack of evidence of omeprazole genotoxicity in Sprague-Dawley rats.
E. Mereto +3
Mutagenesis
1993 ·
13 citations
DOI
Omeprazole did not induce DNA fragmentation or clastogenic activity in rats, but showed potential promoting activity on liver tumors.
Pharmacological Effects and Toxicogenetic Impacts of Omeprazole: Genomic Instability and Cancer
M. F. C. J. Paz +21
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
2020 ·
18 citations
PDF
DOI
Long-term use of omeprazole can induce genomic instability and increase the risk of certain types of cancer.
Mechanisms of the Statins Cytotoxicity in Freshly Isolated Rat Hepatocytes
N. Abdoli +3
Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology
2013 ·
61 citations
PDF
DOI
Statins can cause cytotoxicity in rat hepatocytes through oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.
Gene Expression Analysis for Statin-induced Cytotoxicity from Rat Primary Hepatocytes
M. Ko +5
2010 ·
3 citations
DOI
The paper examines gene expression changes in rat primary hepatocytes to understand the mechanism of statin-induced liver toxicity.
Statins: Adverse reactions, oxidative stress and metabolic interactions
Aimei Liu +9
Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2019 ·
108 citations
DOI
Excessive or long-term use of statins can cause cytotoxicity, liver injury, kidney damage, and myopathy, which may be mediated by oxidative stress.
unfortunately i could go on citing papers like these for days....
What a bunch of hogwash...funny it's coming out just now...
Hmmmm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiley_(publisher)#Controversies
yeah that bogus "dirt road" Danny he was a fake and he got thousands of people to trust this evil crap!! and then he dies suddenly? what a exit plan after he knowingly participated in getting innocent people to take it. Yes I took a few tubes but then Father God and Holy Spirit told me to throw it all out!! I am so glad I did and someone is still pushing that damn fenzabozle as well on rumormillnews.com to-day Thanks Tim for standing for Father God and Truth!!
SARS-COV2 (or any so-called "variant") and HIV do not exist. No virus has ever fulfilled Koch's or River's postulates. No experiment to isolate has followed the scientific method - there are no controls.
Their method of "isolation" seems to serve the exact opposite of the definition- rather than to separate from everything else, they ADD more unknown genetic material to the petri dish of supposedly "infected" viral cells... then they add toxic chemicals & nutrient-depleting chemicald.... then they say "Ah-ha! The cells are dying!!! Therefore, it MUST be a virus!"
No shit the cells are dying. Thats what happens when you poison cells & starve them of critical nutrients.
They never do the exact same steps but without adding supposedly "infected" viral sample. However, Dr Stephan Lanka has done it. And he has disproven the entire THEORY of virology.
https://snooze2awaken.com/2022/01/11/if-everyone-understood-the-implications-of-this-revolutionary-experiment-the-whole-covid-charade-would-end/
https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/08/13/the-virus-misconception-part-iii-corona-simple-and-understandable/
You seem confused - you cant "mimic" something that does not exist. It isn't possible.
Cell cultures are not equivalent to a bioweapon. It is a toxic soup of biological and pharmaceutical components. Thats it. Youre conflating the so-called "isolation" process with a bio-weapon. Which is incorrect.
Curious stuff.
It 'has' been around for decades. Before the psychopaths pivoted to prompt-lethal injections. Was on the WHO list of essential medicines. Had been patented.
Pharma wasn't ever pure. Nor WHO. Or FDA/CDC.. So none of that probably matters.
But, with many Billions of doses administered over decades, into humans and livestock, surely these 'issues' would have presented? The sample size is massive.
I would want to dive deep on each trial, each PI, and anyone associated with them. We've already seen that virtually no-one absent conflicts of interest gets published. Or sits on the Boards. Or Panels. Or, Or, Or...
I guess the only 'cure' you can really trust is the one you grow yourself or take from nature. What a terrible state we've been driven to - trust has been decimated. And it is all aligned with the 4th IR Firesale - everything must crumble before the Luciferians BBB.
Peace.
You need to accept that any product that is foreign to human biochemistry always has the potential to be harmful. Toxicology must be respected when dealing with anything injected, transdermally applied, consumed or inhaled into the sinuses or lungs.
Any belief is irrelevant as facts and understanding matter conclusively.
Thats some backwards logic ya got there. You're told 1 big pharma drug is "safe & effective", while knowing that is a flat out lie.
Then there are conflicting mainstream opinions on whether Ivermectin is "safe & effective" (despite the fence-sitters & those who buy into germ theory choosing to believe the messaging was 100% "negative" , there were actually tons of so-called "normies" and mainstream sources who were pushing Ivermectin & HCQ). But somehow THIS big pharma drug is OBVIOUSLY actually "safe & effective".
Rather than flat out tell yourself that you can't trust THIS study for some arbitrary reason (but other studies are ok, as long as they show positive outcomes right?), consider this source instead?
https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/IVERMECTIN:0c5