20 Comments

Thanks Tim! Very few people dare to look at the toxicity of Ivermectin. Bravo! The only two others I know with a sensible take are Steve Falconer (Spacebusters), "Ivermectin Friend or Foe" https://www.bitchute.com/video/3GGjYlLVqP4g/

EDIT 1/7/2023: Three others. Add Dr Amandha Vollmer

And the Late Great Deborah Rose Lusignan (formerly Debbie the Sane Progressive) who ran the Unite4Truth blog as "Nurse Rose": https://www.unite4truth.com/post/red-flag-ivermectin-nanoparticle-study-safe-alternatives-for-seasonal-colds-better-than-insecticide

Debbie called Ivermectin, "The Insecticide Alternative to Clotshots". (Rest in Peace, Debbie Rose!)

Bottom line: NOBODY should be eating an ACUTELY TOXIC Insecticide for a purported Disease WHICH DOES NOT EXIST!

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

I'm not going to check out your links to yourself.

But why don't you explain to me what's erroneous, and/or unscientific?

What I said is 💯% factual, it should be extremely easy to verify from multiple sources.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

> If you and the other “skeptics”

Skeptic? That's your word, not mine.

>won’t check the links

What links?

>propaganda

Propaganda is generally issued by PEOPLE WITH ENORMOUS POWER, not bloggers. NBC and CNN do propaganda. That's out of my league.

> against the Nobel-prize-winning “horse dewormer”

OMFG. The next time someone tells me Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize I'm going to PUKE BILE.

Hey Genius, CHEMICALS don't win the Nobel Prize. Fact Check.

PS: Why do you put "horse dewormer" in scare quotes?

Ivermectin IS HORSE DEWORMER!

But it's better described as a broad spectrum BIOCIDE.

Ivermectin is POISON.

It was DESIGNED TO KILL LIVING THINGS.

That is it's function.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

> Would you rather take Remdesivir, forcible intubation or mandatory mRNA/LNP killshot?

No. Why would I want ANY therapy or prophylactic against a FAKE DISEASE?

I'm done with you, Super Genius.

I've met several Mensa members, and they were all just like you.

Pompous, arrogant, puffed up with hubris... AND WRONG.

You appeal to bogus sources and you don't have the intellectual curiosity or chutzpah to figure that out.

Bye bye.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

> Ivermectin is a zinc ionophore.

So it's a good idea to eat LITERAL INSECTICIDE to increase zinc uptake?

I think there may be better ways to accomplish this.

>It's a great drug

IT'S NOT A DRUG! IT'S A POISON! IT WAS *DESIGNED* TO BE TOXIC TO LIFE! IVERMECTIN IS BUG KILLER!! and guess what? OUR biology is not so different that bug biology.

> with very strong antioxidant properties;

I prefer carrots, beets, oranges, peppers, and any brightly colored vegetables.

> that's why it's used to treat cancer.

OMFG. So-called "Cancer" is the result of POISONING. You don't EAT MORE POISON in response to getting poisoned!!! OMG how freaking DUMB.

> So sorry, this is unscientific.

You got that right.

> the links I provided, they can save lives

You are in a CULT if you think eating LITERAL INSECTICIDE, with ACUTE TOXICITY 10mg/kg, is a good idea.

> Oxidative stress is the real cause of Covid's so-called complications and deaths

Bullshit. There is NO SUCH DISEASE as "COVID". It doesn't pass muster a DOZEN different ways. Do we need to review the list?

👉NO New, Unique, or Defining Syndrome (clinical expression) = SHOW STOPPER! Pneumonia is NOT NEW!

👉NO rigorous etiology (including search for toxic cause of the "non-defining syndrome")

👉NO SUSPECT PATHOGEN has been identified / isolated / purified (SARS-CoV-2 is a *computer model*)

👉NO PROOF this phantom pathogen causes the non-distinguishing syndrome (what a freaking joke this all is!)

👉NO TEST EXIST for the MISSING pathogen which has been calibrated to real-world reference materials, i.e., ACTUAL Certified VIRAL ISOLATES obtained from a sick patient. So any discussions about "viral load" or "case fatality rates" or "infection rates" are FRAUDULENT

Taking Ivermectin (POISON!) to prevent COnVID

is about as dumb as taking DDT to prevent Unicorn Bites.

Only IVM is 250x more toxic that DDT.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

I don't know what kind of reality you live in, but Nobody.... ABSOLUTELY NO ONE "needs" to eat an ACUTELY TOXIC INSECTICIDE.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2023Liked by Tim Truth

"Low toxicity" is still toxic! Yet, people are taking it more and more at the first sign of a sniffle to proactively fight off what they believe, even a slight chance, in their minds, may be covid. I think the constant and intermittent use is creating the symptoms of a toxic poisoning that has been labeled as Long Covid or Long Haul Covid.

Expand full comment

This presentation cited by Bill Huston via a comment here resulted in this comment I posted there and am reposting here for brevity - https://www.bitchute.com/video/3GGjYlLVqP4g/

This presentation is flawed beyond baseline.

The tone of delivery 'sounds' informed, in the same a prosecutor might address the jury as to why a conviction is needed, but is in no way credible.

There are potential issues with the drug, in rare circumstance, but overall, you've been putting into and onto your pets each season, every season, woof woof. Says The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA®) aspca.org

'Ivermectin (a drug in the avermectin family) is used for control of parasites in animals. It’s mainly used to treat gastrointestinal and lung parasites and certain external parasites found in cattle, sheep, horses, dogs, cats and swine. It can also be used as heartworm prevention in dogs and cats.'

Wait a second..

Your pets ?

What about all the great work that is being denied to those symbiotic parasites your pets host?!? Did those parasites go back into their blood stream?? Oh mY!!

No dip shit they didn't. The immune system dealt with the exosomes, debris, and waste ejected as waste either through the usual outlets, the bowels, urine and respiration. It's not very likely, but check your dog or cat's stools. I'm not saying you can expect them to shit nickels, but any sample properly obtained can be examined in the lab and so forth.

The 50 mg death threshold obtained on the rats?

When a toxicity threshold is obtained it is done on the basis of what it takes to achieve a fatality. A single 15mg dose of Ivermectin is the typical amount to treat a horse for heartworm.

The fact that it took 50mg to kill a rat in no manner says anything other than underscore its low toxicity levels and general acceptance by both human and animal recipient.

The presenter of this hit piece is too lost in his own stylistic gestalt and his research efforts odds with the facts.

I have just read some information on a substack post that is citing research out of Nigeria on low and defective sperm counts. While there is some research that predates Sars-Cov2 on sperm counts in some domestic farm animals, the numbers are minor at best. No mention is made of the Nigeran men in the study as to whether or not they were infected with Covid-19, presumably because the author of the article presenting this research, posits that SarsCov2 does not actually exist.

While that question may be valid given the lack of any isolated sample from a single lab, the Cas9 insertion points in the fragment that was in existence and then modelled by software thereafter, speaks to something lab made to say the least.

If Covid-19 were actually a lab augmented Flu virus*- it is still not in question or any doubt, that something far from any other usual seasonal strain of Coronavirus or Flu had made itself known*.

Post edit *

Apologies for the suggestion on the authors position as to the question on the validity of virology itself - my bad. What I cannot see however is the Covid-19 ala the spike protein affected control group - nor any vaccination Cov-19 status of the participants.

Expand full comment

Hi Tim, do you have a reference to this study?

Expand full comment

The PSYOP during the covid scam, cleverly built an image of 'Ivermectin to the rescue',... 'if only the feds would allow it'.. Fast forward to the reality that they wanted this ‘good cop - bad cop’ fiction to convince people ‘Ivermectin = GOOD cop’. In fact, anything that is made by the pharmaceutical industry is to be held suspect.

SHORT STORY:

In October 2022, I had a 30 day bout with the demonic illness - 'covid' (Spelled 'divoc' in Hebrew).. A well intentioned friend sent me 2 bottles of Ivermectin. (I was self treating at home, taking NO Meds and staying CLEAR of doctors).

The Lord showed me to NOT TAKE IT.

Then He went so far as to hide it from me. The 2 bottles disappeared in my house, and I have not found them TO THIS DAY.

Whatever I was spared, is not just found in Ivermectin though.. it's in dental anesthesia (clever isn’t it? To put poisons into the things routinely used by doctors).. it’s in vaccines.. and its in a growing body of daily use products nationwide.

Your best bet is to do what my family does - and eschew ANY and ALL pharmaceutical products - but especially in liquid form.

VJCB

Expand full comment

Did anyone investigate the ivermectin to see what was in the pills being given? What lot numbers were used? It could be done on purpose by Big Pharma to reduce the population folks just saying! Look what they did with the Gene Therapy program worldwide!

Expand full comment

Tim, thanks for putting in some good work here.

Any chance Hydroxychloroquine has been studied this way?

Expand full comment

So I asked if they were vaxed and the answer is no as the study was in 2011

Expand full comment
Expand full comment

Why would anyone take that much IVM for 11 months straight? Was there follow up studies to see if sperm counts and normality return?

Expand full comment