36 Comments
User's avatar
Mat K's avatar

Yet none of the more recent large studies, that were discredited by the establishment as ineffective reported any of this. That the establishment never seized on it (until now) to dissuade use of it speaks volumes.

Tim Truth's avatar

Yeah, all the establishment could muster was "horse dewormer"? And then they played along with the Joe Rogan psyop. It's straight up deadly, clastogenic cockroach poison (kills animals too)

Medical Truth Podcast's avatar

In my opinion don't trust any pharmaceutical! They are all poison!

ArtemisForestFairy's avatar

I stick with herbs, generally less risky.

The Wailing Banshee's avatar

What was the point of capturing bats & forcing this shit on them?

Willi G's avatar

Why did Jeffrey Dahmer dismember animals (later leading to humans)?

Because they're sick psychopaths would be my guess.

Psychopathic leaders world-wide forced the ModRNA jab on people, including babies.

James B's avatar

I think this is one of the biggest misconceptions about any idea of the global elite, that they must be "evil" or "sick". And this misconception gets people stuck in concepts of good vs. evil, unable to understand what is actually going on. If you can try to imagine yourself in their shoes, it's not a great leap to concern yourself with managing the "flock" which doesn't require invoking any idea of "evil", at least not in the way most people imagine it. There is surely some deviancy, and perversion, yes. But many of the actions of the elite which are perceived as evil, like the quest for depopulation, are not fundamentally different than the decisions that a shepherd tending to his flock might make. The shepherd's objectives overlap the sheep's desires, but they are not in complete unison. The shepherd is always prepared to sacrifice some part of the flock to ensure his & the flock's survival. Really, what is happening, is that many "sheep" who were born within the flock and do not know anything but the flock, are becoming aware of this arrangement. If we define "evil" more broadly, as any being controlling another being for any motive whatsoever, then guess what? We are probably all "evil".

Tom leach's avatar

“everybody’s got an opinion” look at the Historical record, then think for yourself.

Timothy Fleming's avatar

So hard to get this kinda of info on drugs that compete against ivermectin! Near impossible actually always makes you wonder why articles like these are so freely available and pop up just as ivermectin is getting a name for itself as a wonder drug help all kinda drug. Makes me scratch my chin at least. Feels a little fishy to me…! Open to all info happy you shared

Thank you

ArtemisForestFairy's avatar

Impressive amount of work you did here. Gratitude.

Pannacur's avatar

I have collies, so this hits close to home(Never used Ivermectin), I still have to study it though, thank you again Tim, and for adding all the full report links, I am very grateful.

Ken, or Kenny Genku Erickson's avatar

It also ruins pasture ecosystems (kills dung beetles) and promotes mire horn flies. Poison.

Kathleen Pimentel's avatar

Important information to be aware and cautious going forward 🤔

Bridget's avatar

If you understand the Hegelian Dialectic, you know there are endless ways for TPTB to reach us all.

Kathleen Pimentel's avatar

Important information to be aware and cautious going forward 🤔

Extreme Groundskeeping's avatar

“characterized by mystical-religious, erotomaniac, harm and reference delusions, auditory and visual hallucinations adding isolation, abulia, apathy, dialogued soliloquies, and spontaneous crying.” — Bartender, make it a double MERKMectin on the rocks and leave the tab open.

Kevin Ford's avatar

The thumbnail says it all.

Ashwyn's avatar

They were trying to get everyone to take the ‘vaccines’ at that point. Now, serendipitously, they have a neurotoxic pesticide that can be promoted to those people who want to stick it to the man.

MG Mayers's avatar

All seriously overdosed.

Barb L's avatar

What can one believe ?? Nothing is what it seems. I’m totally disillusioned with everything!

Ashwyn's avatar

I think there is a freedom in realizing that one has been totally wrong in the past, and that one might be wrong again. And with experience hopefully one gets more discerning.

On the whole, it’s probably good for people to believe in different health regimes as it is a safeguard against disaster.

User's avatar
Comment removed
May 12, 2024Edited
Comment removed
Ashwyn's avatar

I wouldn’t take it myself. It’s true that two people I respect consider the major harms to be dose dependent. However given the potential for serious side effects (a) with time if it builds up in the system, (b) with dosage if this is wrongly estimated,(c) with unknown genetic mutations, and (d) with unfortunate interactions with other substances, it certainly doesn’t seem like it should be self-prescribed.

With a broader perspective, it’s also bad for the water and soil. See 5.1 in this document:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.940975/full

Gary McCollom's avatar

Really now, bad for the soil when IVM actually comes from the soil.

Ashwyn's avatar

It’s manufactured in a pharmaceutical laboratory. Read section 5.1 in the article above about how it kills useful organisms like earthworms in the soil and water.

The article below goes into how it was made and manufactured:

https://open.substack.com/pub/chemtrails/p/ivermectin-and-population-control?r=7ikvr&utm_medium=ios

Maxi Minimalist's avatar

This is what Brave AI writes about Ivermectin major ingredient. That being said, everybody is free to make their own decisions.

Introduction to 22,23-Dihydroavermectin B1a MSDS: 22,23-Dihydroavermectin B1a, also known as Ivermectin, is a semi-synthetic derivative of the avermectins. It is a mixture of two homologous compounds, 5-O-demethyl-22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a (not less than 80%) and B1b (not more than 20%). The compound is used as an antiparasitic agent in humans and animals.

Chemical and Physical Properties: 22,23-Dihydroavermectin B1a is a white powder with a molecular formula of C48H74O14 and a molecular weight of 875.1 g/mol. It has a melting point of 155-160°C and is soluble in methyl ethyl ketone, propylene glycol, or polypropylene glycol, but not in saturated hydrocarbons.

Toxicity and Safety Information: The compound is toxic to humans and animals if ingested, inhaled, or if it comes into contact with the skin. It can cause vomiting, salivation, diarrhea, melena, and death in severe cases. It is also a positive allosteric modulator of the α7 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and modulates glutamate-GABA-activated chloride channels.

Handling and Storage: 22,23-Dihydroavermectin B1a should be handled with care, and users should wear protective clothing, gloves, and eye protection. It should be stored in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight and moisture.

Disposal Considerations: The compound should be disposed of in accordance with local and national regulations. It should not be released into the environment, and disposal should be carried out by a licensed waste disposal company.

Tim's avatar

What ever happened to DPL? I found out about you through her? substack but it seems to have completely disappeared.